首页> 外文OA文献 >Fine mapping of multiple QTL using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping – A comparison of single QTL and multi QTL methods
【2h】

Fine mapping of multiple QTL using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping – A comparison of single QTL and multi QTL methods

机译:使用组合链接和链接不平衡映射对多个QTL进行精细映射–单个QTL和多个QTL方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two previously described QTL mapping methods, which combine linkage analysis (LA) and linkage disequilibrium analysis (LD), were compared for their ability to detect and map multiple QTL. The methods were tested on five different simulated data sets in which the exact QTL positions were known. Every simulated data set contained two QTL, but the distances between these QTL were varied from 15 to 150 cM. The results show that the single QTL mapping method (LDLA) gave good results as long as the distance between the QTL was large (> 90 cM). When the distance between the QTL was reduced, the single QTL method had problems positioning the two QTL and tended to position only one QTL, i.e. a "ghost" QTL, in between the two real QTL positions. The multi QTL mapping method (MP-LDLA) gave good results for all evaluated distances between the QTL. For the large distances between the QTL (> 90 cM) the single QTL method more often positioned the QTL in the correct marker bracket, but considering the broader likelihood peaks of the single point method it could be argued that the multi QTL method was more precise. Since the distances were reduced the multi QTL method was clearly more accurate than the single QTL method. The two methods combine well, and together provide a good tool to position single or multiple QTL in practical situations, where the number of QTL and their positions are unknown.
机译:比较了两种先前描述的结合了连锁分析(LA)和连锁不平衡分析(LD)的QTL映射方法的检测和映射多个QTL的能力。这些方法在五个不同的模拟数据集上进行了测试,在这些数据集中已知了确切的QTL位置。每个模拟数据集都包含两个QTL,但是这些QTL之间的距离从15到150 cM不等。结果表明,只要QTL之间的距离较大(> 90 cM),单个QTL映射方法(LDLA)就会产生良好的结果。当减小QTL之间的距离时,单个QTL方法在定位两个QTL时会遇到问题,并且倾向于在两个实际QTL位置之间仅定位一个QTL,即“假” QTL。对于所有评估的QTL之间的距离,多QTL映射方法(MP-LDLA)均给出了良好的结果。对于QTL之间的较大距离(> 90 cM),单个QTL方法通常将QTL定位在正确的标记支架中,但是考虑到单点方法的较宽的可能性峰,可以认为多QTL方法更为精确。由于减少了距离,因此多QTL方法明显比单QTL方法更准确。两种方法很好地结合在一起,并在一起提供了一个在实际情况下定位单个或多个QTL的好工具,其中QTL的数量及其位置未知。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号